The Daily Practice blog is on hiatus for the duration of the Legal Wellness Tour. Visit the Tour Blog page instead. |
posted Feb 3, 2010 6:36 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
During the first week of the month, I spend some time looking back at the Google Analytics reports for my website for the previous month. I especially like the report that shows me which page was most popular. Looking at the number of hits for each blog post gives me an idea of what topics people are most interested in. However this month one blog post far surpassed the rest, and I realized it's because I commented on a popular blog and mentioned my post, so I was reaching a much broader audience than usual.
This reminds me that data must always have a context. This is true of a website analytics report, and it is also true of the data closest to us - our emotions. A strong emotional reaction is a trigger to remind us to stop and assess the context. It's most important to remember that external circumstance (or other people) cannot cause these reactions - it's a reflection of something going on internally.
Had I not stopped to think about why that blog post had so much more activity, and realized that I had linked it elsewhere, I might have put extra, unneeded focus on that topic. Similarly, if I don't stop and think when I feel outraged or wronged, I might not see the whole picture and react in a way that hurts myself and others. |
posted Feb 1, 2010 6:45 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
If you spend any time on Facebook, you've probably noticed many people have changed their profile pictures to that of a celebrity they resemble. While the word "doppelganger" has come to mean someone with similar physical features, originally it was a ghostly double and a bad omen. Abraham Lincoln is said to have seen his doppelganger on the night he was first elected President, and Mary Todd Lincoln suggested it meant he would be re-elected to a second term but not survive.
We often create doubles of ourselves, when we adopt different personas for different areas of our lives. Then we're set with the task of trying to "balance" these different identities, when what we really need to do is integrate them. When we are not whole, parts of our lives are separated and it is difficult to make the decisions that best meet our needs and wants. We end up in a juggling act trying to keep each piece satisfied, perpetuating the schism and conflict.
Today, think of two conflicting goals you have set yourself. Look at the different parts of yourself that desires each goal. Then think about the commonalities each part has. |
posted Jan 27, 2010 7:16 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
The final step of the Lightning Dreamwork game is for the dreamer to make an action plan. For my dream, my action plan is to stay flexible in my workshop spaces, and look for creative ways to make the best of them.
This process demonstrates a collaborative, creative problem-solving approach. Using the images from dreams and thoughts shared by others, we can see an issue from a different angle. We get insights we wouldn't have by using "rational" reasoning, which just might lead to that breakthrough we've been struggling to achieve.
Where have I been "stuck" trying to fix a problem? Can I let go of reasoning it through and be open to finding a creative solution? |
posted Jan 25, 2010 6:37 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
I awoke this morning dreaming of leading a group of lawyers in a stained glass workshop, with a twist - the materials were from an elementary school classroom. I handed out Dixie cups, colorful tissue paper, scissors, glue and tape as the supplies. I watched as the participants worked in teams of two, making elaborate panels and shapes. More people kept joining in after seeing how enriching the activity was. We were filled to capacity, with more wanting to get in.
I'll use this dream to demonstrate Lightning Dreamwork, a technique my teacher invented to share dreams in a fast and fun way: First, the dreamer tells the dream like a story. Next, we ask how the dreamer felt on waking from the dream, as emotions are the Rosetta Stone for the dreamer (remember, emotions are data, showing us where to look). I felt excited and a sense of anticipation on waking. The next step is to do a reality check - could this dream be literal in some way? What elements from the dream are familiar from waking life, and what events could play out in the future (even symbolically). I recognized some of the workshop participants, all lawyers I know. I am, of course, leading workshops for lawyers on a regular basis, but I had not considered such a craft exercise before. The final question is to ask the dreamer what she wants to know about the dream - this will inform what we share with the dreamer. I want to know how the dream relates to the Legal Wellness Tour. After the dreamer answers the questions, we share our thoughts with her, prefacing them with "If it were my dream," and keeping statements in the first person. (We don't want to impose our view on the dreamer. I facilitated Lightning Dreamwork with my mom and aunts one time, and one of them said, "If it were my dream, you should spend more time with your sisters!"). I'll share a thought with myself playing the other role - If it were my dream I might think about how my tools for lawyers resemble the children's craft supplies. Perhaps I need to keep it even simpler than I have planned. So that's Lightning Dreamwork! There's one more step I'll share tomorrow, after you tell me your thoughts on the dream. You can share on Twitter (@legalwellness), on our Facebook page, or by email. |
posted Jan 22, 2010 7:14 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
Today on Sesame Street, the theme is Seasons. We are in the deep of winter here in Boston, but soon we'll be heading out on Tour all across the U.S. Knowing that soon we'll (hopefully) be in 70+ degree weather makes these days of below-freezing weather easier to bear. I wouldn't want to live without seasons, but usually by mid-February I am ready for a break from the snow. As Shakespeare wrote,
Blow, blow, thou winter wind Thou art not so unkind As man's ingratitude |
posted Jan 21, 2010 6:34 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
I've been polishing a new program this week, designed to help busy lawyers reduce stress. The Ten-Minute Tuneup is a quick way to refocus and re-energize, by zoning in on the Higher Purpose. I'll share an excerpt from my article Practicing on Purpose in the Law Firm to illustrate one benefit of daily tuneups:
The lawyer personality type (achievement-oriented, aggressive and competitive, preferring not to rely on social support structures) combined with law school training result in the interpersonal shortcomings identified by industry consultant David Maister (lack of trust, skepticism about values, professional detachment, and difficulty committing to decisions). Lawyers don't need to change who they are, or alter their basic make-up to enact change[.] In fact, it is likely that trying to reduce or eliminate the hard edges of the lawyer personality type could result in psychological harm, less effective lawyering, or both. Instead of replacing tools and skills, lawyers can enhance them by adding nuances of their opposite qualities. Competitiveness need not lead to lack of trust. The commonality to the lawyer personality type and the interpersonal shortcomings relates to decision-making style. Law school takes minds generally predisposed to analytical, "rational" decision-making and hones them to razor-sharp weapons. Self-reflection or intuitive thinking is devalued, and any inclination in that direction is obliterated by the end of the first year of law school.
If lawyers can acknowledge the value of other types of thinking, and accept lessons from self-reflection, then they have a chance to overcome their interpersonal shortcomings[.]
I'll be offering the Ten-Minute Tuneup to law firms in select cities on the Legal Wellness Tour. Email me to find out how to bring the program to your firm. |
posted Jan 19, 2010 9:39 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
In December I wrote about the threat of Asian carp to Lake Michigan, and the drastic measures being taken to stop them. The issue reached the U.S. Supreme Court today, which denied the state of Michigan's request for an injunction to close Chicago-area locks to block the fish. The Great Lakes states, and the Canadian province of Ontario now rely on President Obama as a last resort to temporarily buttress the lakes until a permanent solution is found.
To return to the wellness parallels in this story, let's revisit why the carp are in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal. In the 1960s, southern states had overgrowth of algae, and imported Asian carp, voracious eaters with no natural predators. The carp flourished and spread north through the rivers, and now a half century later threaten the Great Lakes ecosystem.
This reminds me of attempts we might make to make ourselves feel better, only to cause damage in the long run, and in perhaps unexpected ways. Then we need to turn to outside resources (like Michigan turning to the Supreme Court) to offer solutions.
How do I self-treat or self-medicate in ways that might be harmful to me? |
posted Jan 13, 2010 7:15 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
Scientists are very close to finding proof that Mars once sustained life, according to an article in Scientific American. Researchers aren't using new information, though, but an asteroid that crashed to Earth nearly 100 years ago. The rock contains what appears to be a colony of bacteria, and new instruments can test whether this is a geological formation or really bacteria.
This makes me think of how new tools can be really helpful to wellness, too. Sometimes we might want new information to improve or progress, when what we really need is to look at what we already have in a new way, just like the scientists re-examining the Martian asteroid. We might already have the answer we're seeking, but just don't have a way to uncover it.
Where have I been looking outside myself for answers? Can I look inside, maybe a different way, and see if I get new insight? |
posted Jan 11, 2010 7:13 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
[
updated Jan 13, 2010 6:57 AM
]
There are just four weeks to go until The Legal Wellness Tour 2010 starts, and the excitement is palpable. We're finalizing the tour stops, procuring provisions, and planning relaxing excursions. Although it will be challenging to spend so much time in the car with a toddler, and to have everything we need organized and compact enough to fit in the cargo areas, we're looking forward to the freedom of being on the road.
I'm eagerly anticipating sharing the 7 Purposes wellness model with lawyers all around the U.S. Thinking of all the different people I'll meet, and how they'll each have their own story and Purpose, and will be at different points in their paths, reaffirms that Practicing on Purpose is an essential part of my Higher Purpose. |
posted Jan 7, 2010 9:41 AM by Gretchen Duhaime
The Law School Innovation blog linked to a blog post by one of my former professors, and knowing that his views don't mesh with what most consider to be innovation, I thought I'd take a look. I took a course in Trusts with him, and he made it very clear that in his view it should be a required class, and more than 2 credits (I certainly felt as though I did more than 2 credits worth of work!).
In the blog post, he critiques the publication and scholarship interests (perhaps requirements) of professors as changing curriculum from common law to "sociology." While I disagree with his assertion that the Socratic method deserves a revival (and I don't recall his using it much in class, either), I agree with his statement that, "Professional schools need to strike a balance between book-learning and real-world experience."
The ALI-ABA and ACLEA just released its final recommendations from its Critical Issues Summit, and it follows the ABA's path toward outcome-oriented law school curricula. Although not as strongly worded as Prof. Rounds' critique, the authors make it clear that preparing lawyers for practice should be the goal of legal education, not fostering an environment for faculty scholarship. The report also suggests law faculty need to gain teaching skills for effective adult learning.
If you recall my previous post on the latest research in adult learning, memorizing facts does not produce the best learning results - challenging one's assumptions does. My beef with my first-year law classes was the lack of context. Although we weren't learning by rote, there wasn't a lot of weaving together of different concepts, or opportunity to reflect on what we were learning and how that would help us become effective lawyers. In my wellness workshops for law students, I suggest that they add a "Why?" section to their case briefs, to keep curiosity as part of their learning.
Why the Brooklyn Bridge image on this post? It's my metaphor for the Socratic method. They are both standing monuments to Industrial-Age America. |
|